But first some house cleaning: I've been quite busy the last week and a half or so and missed a pretty useless move; that being the signing of serviceable, but still well below average veteran Abraham Nunez. Nunez has been around for a while now and never ever lived up to his hype. The key to the deal is really that it's a minor league contract and therefore offers nothing but a little bit of veteran depth in the minor league system. Drew Anderson was waived and claimed by the Reds. That really doesn't mean anything either, but if Nunez ends up on the 25 man roster, there's going to be a lot of questions from this end.
Now as for Bill Hall. South Side Rob of the Brewer Nation blog, linked in the side bar, has a gripe with the claims that Hall's drop off last year was directly related to the position change as well as the contract year. And he has every right to be upset, for the sole reason that Bill Hall is a dead average player, no better, no worse. But I suggest that part of the drop off was in fact represented in last year's numbers. To make things easy, throw out Hall's 2006 season. Let's look solely at his 2007 and 2005 numbers. 2006 is what I would consider an anomaly amongst numbers based on his previous seasons because Hall was given a different kind of opportunity and was play for his future. But if you really look at them, the only thing that improved was his power numbers.
2005 .291/.342/.495 17 HR 62 RBIs 501 ABs 103 SOs
2007 .254/.315/.342 14 HRs 63 RBIs 452 ABs 128 SOs
Okay, so a 37 point drop in Avg, a 27 point drop in OBP and a 153 point drop in SLG. Most players gradually increase in all of these categories until the magic age of 30. Bill Hall is only 28 years old and therefore should continue improvement with this bat. His 30 HRs in 2006 were well above what he was supposed to be at and I believe that he spent much of the year trying achieve this total yet again, but it's just not what he is. He's a .270/.350 guy who can hit 20 HRs a year if he's just more selective at the plate.
Bill Hall's mental game was clearly out of whack from the start last year. With the new contract, a position change and the introduction of high expectations, Hall pressed... a lot. It showed at every AB, so much so that by the end of the year he had opened his stance some more to try and make a reasonable adjustment and see the ball a little quicker. Remember how this trick worked with Geoff Jenkins two years ago? Yeah, adjustments don't work so well, but fresh eyes and a new season do. I'm guessing that Hall will have the year we need from him in the field and at the plate: My prediction: .274/.349/.440 with 19 HRs and 70 RBIs. And if you're not happy with that, you just found out why you're not a GM for a Major League baseball team.
Now the Ryan Braun move to left field is what baseball people call, 'hiding'. I'll be the first to admit, I don't like the move, but I understand it. Mike Cameron is not the answer this team needed, but it appears it was the only one available. I agree that his talent did not upgrade the team in the least, but the team itself HAS improved everywhere on the field. Let's disregard pitching and realize that all of the Brewers every day players are coming back with the exception of Johnny Estrada (No Jenkins was not an every day player). Even better, these guys have the experience of a playoff race and a year of seeing NL pitchers. But wait! There's more, all of these guys are under contract for 3-4 more years, so finding the Ultimate answer to putting this team over the top was not all that necessary. These guys might be able to do it themselves.
Ryan Braun could definitely turn into a quality major league 3rd baseman because he's athletic, has a canon and has good quickness. The problem is, he's fidgety. As a result is footwork is always off and his arm slot is different with every throw. So why left-field? Does it make him a better defender?
No, but it gives him a lot more room for error and a lot more time to get the ball in and out, while not making physical errors. I'm not a baseball expert, but I have played the game, and I have played 3rd base and the outfield. The key difference is SPEED. The hot corner is the longest throw in the infield and it needs to be made with little hesitation. One bobble or mishandle while taking the ball from the glove turns a routine play into a potential infield hit. Smooth is fast, fast is smooth. Braun was fast, but he was bumpy and that takes thousands of groundballs to get over. In left field, you have plenty of time to approach the ball, set your feet, square up your cutoff man and throw the ball in. Even better, Braun will not have to rocket the ball every time. He can take a little off it because bang bang plays at 2nd base are usually the result of hustle from the outfielder or the baserunner and if you have a good team, back-up is always available, protecting possible extra bases.
Not much else can be said. I liked Braun at 3rd just as I liked Weeks at 2nd, but i have no gripes. There was no way this team was going to give up a Corey Hart or Yovani Gallardo for a guy like Blalock who would be out in 2-3 years anyways, though I would consider a move with JJ Hardy next year if Escobar proves to be of any worth and we can get a above average 3rd baseman long term. Mat Gamel will not be the man for at least 3 years in my eyes. He just needs that many more ground balls to make me that comfortable with him.
Well that's it Brewers fans. I may not always be right about these things, but I think I have a pretty good idea. If you have a gripe, you better back it up, don't just say I'm retarded like half of nobodies on the JSOnline Blog.
5 comments:
Bill Hall was spotted doing yogic exercises with Kelvim Escobar....It's a strange mix of stretching and beer drinking, but statistically it provided Kelvim his arrival last year onto the scene of baseball's best.....
Logically speaking, I expect Hall to hit 31 homeruns in 2008 and then 3 in 2009 and then Brewer fans will flush statistics out towards Luddington, Michigan by wy of the Lake and start drinking more and cheering even louder for the Brewers....because my theory is too much statifying breeds negativity.
One more thing...glad to see another article by you....The fun of this blog stuff happens with comments and the dialogue and heated arguments that follow. There's some decent sparring that goes on at the dugoutcentral.com and I hope the same for Brew Crew Pub.....I'm gonna post your blog address when the Brewers come up for discussion which happens fairly frequently...like 3 times since January 1st.....For the most part, people are down on the kendall signing, but I read an interesting counter point today pointing out the ERA of Oakland pitchers in the aftermath of Kendall behind the plate. Hopefully, we can provoke fans to check out Brew Crew Pub for a daily bashing of each other....ya know, like baseball democracy out on the corner where all ideas are welcome under the Brewer sun.
I'll take you comment as a compliment, and it's greatly appreciated. I love spending the time to write these up and it's humbling to know at least one person appreciates it. Hopefully we can get some more folks to read this blog and I'll gladly do more work to keep it rolling.
As for the Kendall comment, I had just read that somewhere not too long ago, but I couldn't find the numbers myself so I didn't want to post that. Perhaps I'll look for a site that an do that and put it on my list of resources. As for the Escobar comment... HA! That's like the fan diet. Beer and yoga, what's more relaxing?
Any suggestions for more research, let me know. The season is not far away, and I'm considering a trip to Nashville one week to watch the AAA team with Escobar and the rest of our future, so maybe I'll do a quick write up about our minor league teams to pass the time since Melvin won't ship out Vargas or Capuano til the end of Spring Training.
So I found the stat at ESPN.com. Turns out Estrada has a better career CERA (Catcher's Earned Run Average) by about 0.20. Furthermore, Kendall's arrival in Oakland resulted in an increase of about .40 CERA compared to Ramon Hernandez in 2004, so whoever brought that up didn't do their homework.
CERA is a really questionable stat anyways because it also reflects the quality of the pitchers a guy has to deal with. Kendall's arrival in Oakland resulted in an immediate drop of about .80 and and average drop of about .50 there after, clearly a representation of the poor teams Pittsburgh has put on the field..
Bummer to find out the truth about ERA's in pre and post Kendall caugh teams, but as you say....the stat like all stats have to be taken as not the final word.
Your Nashville trip sounds awesome.
Would you be going after the final roster is determined?
One research idea. I always wanted to relate the difficulty of switching leagues to statistics in order to show approximately how long it takes an organization to adjust its approach to drafting and development and on field decisions. There probably aren't too many examples to work with....and then what stats do you research?
I don't like making excuses for the Brewers, but leaving the American League must have taken a toll for a few seasons...In the end...last place finishes produce higher draft picks and we reep Fielder and Weeks and Hardy and Braun...
This leads to another point I wanted to make....the reality of team continuity. I'm always surprised to hear players say they're burned out from listening to tales about how great the 1982 Brewers were or the 80 Phillies or 79 Pirates....At the risk of sounding cheesy, I wouldn't want players on my team who refused to take an interest in team history. They don't have to be researching in the library in between innings, but when a media guy brings up the past, they should show some genuine interest....
It helps explain the team's current situation.....The switch to the National League...the por record...the high draft picks....the home grown infield....the winning record in 2007.
It's more than catchy marketing gimicks...it's a link to historic trends like a 40 year drought at third base for some teams....which I would hope causes some players to wonder about stadiums being located on Indian burial mounds.....crane accidents....curses.....
The media hypes these paranormal things into tabloids and in the process reduce them to cracker jack folklore. A curse or trend gains credence as more and more people believe in it. They seem to gain momentum and legitimacy....so if that's the case, players should know about them and consciously work at transcending them...Any suggestions to Brewer players? in Brewer history?
Post a Comment